Oli
Well-known member
What is progress?
When I were a lad at 17 I could?ve had a pretty powerful bike if I could afford to insure it. Someone not much older than me could?ve had a powerful bike at 16 and not even have to wear a helmet or do a meaningful test.
Nowadays we have fantastic S1000RRs available if we want one. So some things have gotten better, and lots of things are safer. But so much dumbing down. [emoji17]
With respect, you can?t seriously be suggesting that having laws that require motorcyclists to wear a helmet and to pass a more comprehensive test in order to ride a motorcycle on public roads be a step in wrong direction ... surely?
I appreciate the objection to the nanny state, and if you?d made the argument about some of the antiquated speed limits or excessive use of speed cameras on motorways etc, I?d agree with you.
But it does seem like you object to any rule that is put in place, in the name of safety, purely as a matter of ?principle?.
Oh and I don?t think the fact that because all but one on here have agreed with you means that people aren?t ?thinking for themselves?. On the contrary, I think it?s just because the majority have a different opinion to you, on these matters.
I also think that given the fact that you now know that a well known member on here died potentially in part due to a lack of brake lever guard, I think it is in quite poor taste to be so publicly objectionable to this new requirement, when in reality it doesn?t represent a significant cost or inconvenience to you and in no way affects your ability to enjoy the sport